References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL
PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL
PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED
"Gone" isn't so important as "not worth expending any more energy on.". So I'm
with Keith and would like to find some words like "when it doesn't take any
more work."
- Ralph
On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:00 PM, "Fernando Gont" wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 12:46 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
>> I'd like for thi
nk we should avoid expending energy on *new*
functions for IPv4.
- Ralph
>
> It's not the protocols... it's the DEPLOYED APPLICATIONS and DEVICES that
> users have.
>
> regards, kiwin
>
> On 6/30/2011 9:11 AM, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote:
>>
>> "Gone&
Comment about DHCPv6 question in line...
- Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Soliman, Hesham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/22/2006 4:51 AM
To: Scott W Brim; General Area Review Team; Jari Arkko; Mark Townsley
(townsley); Bob Hinden; Brian Haberman; Thomas Narten; Erik Nordmark; Wi
