Hi,
I agree with the concept, just want to be sure the PAWS is not expected to
develop these security mechanisms (i.e. the tools) as contrasted to including
or using in PAWS the security tools developed by appropriate expert groups.
Inclusion of robust security mechanisms is required:...
??
Hi Stephen, All,
I believe the current wording
Robust security mechanisms are required to prevent:
device identity spoofing, modification of device requests, modification
of channel enablement information, ...
is acceptable because mechanisms are required means they should be in the
protocol,
