In line as well :
The first stage of the work has not been done yet : the detailed technical
requirements have not been defined and agreed yet,
the second stage of the work with other SDOs to analyse if already exiting
codecs meet these requirements is not done
and yet the Charter on the basis
Hi
It is not clear for me how is handled the editing process of the Charter and
how the agreement or not on the different points contained in it can be
assessed !
The current version is not acceptable, at least with respect to the way
relationships with other SDOs are considered by IETF :
Hello
Obviously, the current requirements document does contain features which are
not supported by today's standardized codecs. As an example, take time
stretching and time compression. Thus, everybody following the discussion
must come to the conclusion that (2) has been answered with