Randall Gellens wrote:
(1) This version still has some editor's notes. Are these intended
for publication?
No. The writeup didn't get copied into the Last Call, but as WG chair, I
believe that the document is complete if all the editor's notes are
deleted. Some of them point to areas that
At 8:44 PM +0100 1/17/07, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
(2) In section 1.3:
An i18mail user has one or more non-ASCII email addresses. Such a
user may have ASCII addresses too; if the user has more than one
email account and corresponding address, or more than one alias for
the
At 8:44 PM +0100 1/17/07, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
(3) In section 4.3:
the risk should be
minimized by the fact that the selection of submission servers are
presumably under the control of the sender's client and the selection
of potential intermediate relays is under the
--On Wednesday, 17 January, 2007 12:12 -0800 Randall Gellens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the second-to-last sentence refer to an ASCII address,
or any address? The wording implies any address, but if
an address is non-ASCII, surely that is a good sign that
the owner of that address
--On Wednesday, 17 January, 2007 12:25 -0800 Randall Gellens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(This could also be mentioned in the smtpext document.)
I haven't seen that possibility raised. I'm somewhat
skeptical that it would be an improvement (it makes the
delay before error reporting
At 3:59 PM -0500 1/17/07, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Wednesday, 17 January, 2007 12:12 -0800 Randall Gellens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the second-to-last sentence refer to an ASCII address,
or any address? The wording implies any address, but if
an address is non-ASCII, surely
--On Wednesday, 17 January, 2007 14:31 -0800 Randall Gellens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about:
Replace:
Note that under this definition, it is not possible to
tell from
the address that an email sender or recipient is an
i18mail user.
with:
Note that under
At 4:02 PM -0500 1/17/07, John C Klensin wrote:
In any event, I'd recommend/request that you specify
text and where it should go.
I'm thinking a brief mention in the Framework document, with more
discussion in the SMTP extension document, and maybe a mention in the
downgrade document.
At 5:40 PM -0500 1/17/07, John C Klensin wrote:
Hmm. Because of my concern that some of the non-ASCII
addresses we will see floating around will result from guessing,
how about
... (A non-ASCII address implies a belief that the...
if you can live with that, and no one else objects
Randall Gellens wrote:
At 3:59 PM -0500 1/17/07, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Wednesday, 17 January, 2007 12:12 -0800 Randall Gellens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the second-to-last sentence refer to an ASCII address,
or any address? The wording implies any address, but if
an
At 9:53 AM +0900 1/18/07, Yangwoo Ko wrote:
How about:
Replace:
Note that under this definition, it is not possible to tell from
the address that an email sender or recipient is an i18mail user.
with:
Note that under this definition, it is not possible to tell from
- Original Message -
From: Randall Gellens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Harald Alvestrand [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: [EAI] Last Call: draft-ietf-eai-framework (Overview
(1) This version still has some editor's notes. Are these intended
for publication?
(2) In section 1.3:
An i18mail user has one or more non-ASCII email addresses. Such a
user may have ASCII addresses too; if the user has more than one
email account and corresponding address, or more
13 matches
Mail list logo
