05, 2008 2:59 PM
To: Narayanan, Vidya
Cc: Glen Zorn; ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bernard Aboba
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
How about the following text for applicability:
It must be noted that any application of EAP keying material to other
usages
Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
How about the following text for applicability:
It must be noted that any application of EAP keying material to other
usages such as handoffs, IP mobility or other applications is only
feasible when those services are provided either by or through the
provider
: Monday, March 24, 2008 11:27 AM
To: Charles Clancy
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bernard Aboba
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
Charles,
-Original Message-
From: Charles Clancy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 7:18 PM
To: Narayanan, Vidya
Cc
For example, consider using a USRK to secure HTTP. If your access
provider did this to deliver firmware updates to your handset, this
might be reasonable, but if amazon.com required it for authentication,
this would be unreasonable.
I do not believe that either application is reasonable.
Charles,
-Original Message-
From: Charles Clancy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 7:18 PM
To: Narayanan, Vidya
Cc: Glen Zorn; ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bernard Aboba
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
Vidya,
... do the responsible thing, which
Vidya,
... do the responsible thing, which would be to clearly define the
applicability, along with providing an interoperable means of defining
the key hierarchy for those usages that want to/can use it.
This is all I'm suggesting we do. I think we should add text to the
document that
Brian E Carpenter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled on
Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:02 PM:
Glen,
On 2008-03-19 04:31, Glen Zorn wrote:
...
Some of us don't subscribe to the IETF list (due to the extremely
poor S/N ratio). Someone did forward me Bernard's original message
to me it
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Glen Zorn
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:31 AM
To: Charles Clancy
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bernard Aboba
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
Charles Clancy scribbled on :
HOKEY,
From Bernard's walled garden LC comments, I've
Charles Clancy scribbled on :
HOKEY,
From Bernard's walled garden LC comments, I've created the
following issue below in the issue tracker.
Some of us don't subscribe to the IETF list (due to the extremely poor
S/N ratio). Someone did forward me Bernard's original message to me
it
/ietf/current/msg50880.html
- Vidya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Glen Zorn
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 8:31 AM
To: Charles Clancy
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bernard Aboba
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
Charles
Glen,
On 2008-03-19 04:31, Glen Zorn wrote:
...
Some of us don't subscribe to the IETF list (due to the extremely poor
S/N ratio). Someone did forward me Bernard's original message to me
it appears to fall squarely into the N category (either that or it is an
early April 1 RFC candidate).
11 matches
Mail list logo