Re: [IAB] [rfc-i] path forward with RFC 3932bis

2009-09-23 Thread John C Klensin
--On Wednesday, September 23, 2009 08:02 +0300 Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote: ... I came up with some ways of changing the text, e.g., just saying work done in the IETF and dropping the word community. However, is not clear to me that any other words couldn't be misunderstood in the

Re: [IAB] [rfc-i] path forward with RFC 3932bis

2009-09-22 Thread John C Klensin
--On Tuesday, September 22, 2009 18:37 +0200 Harald Alvestrand har...@alvestrand.no wrote: ... I'd like to see the phrase in question removed or perhaps clarified (say to include planned standards work or some such). That phrase was also present in RFC 3932, and, as you note, in RFC 2026.

Re: [IAB] [rfc-i] path forward with RFC 3932bis

2009-09-21 Thread Olaf Kolkman
On Sep 21, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: Ok - the problem I have, and the reason that I asked, is that it is not clear to me that the Independent Series Editor (ISE) is part of the RFC Editor any more than the ISRG is going to be. Thus it is the ISE not the RFC Editor that will be