Sorry for barging in late on this thread, but quick questions:
- what's the right mailing list to post to on this one?
- have everyone read RFC 3282 (the standalone "accept-language" spec)?
Seems to me the desired semantic is more accept-language than
content-language.
On 03/10/2013 03:38 PM
ndre;
> Brian Rosen; mmu...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Update on Orlando time for human language draft
> discussion
>
> Sorry for barging in late on this thread, but quick questions:
>
> - what's the right mailing list to post to on this one?
> - have everyone
org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Update on Orlando time for human language draft
discussion
Sorry for barging in late on this thread, but quick questions:
- what's the right mailing list to post to on this one?
- have everyone read RFC 3282 (the standalone "accept-language" spec)?
dreasen; Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) Tschofenig; Peter
Saint-Andre;
Brian Rosen; mmu...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Update on Orlando time for human language draft
discussion
Sorry for barging in late on this thread, but quick questions:
- what's the right mailing list to post to on t
spoo) Tschofenig; Peter
Saint-Andre;
Brian Rosen; mmu...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Update on Orlando time for human language draft
discussion
Sorry for barging in late on this thread, but quick questions:
- what's the right mailing list to post to on this one?
- have ev