Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback

2011-07-05 Thread William J. Mills
...@mnot.net Cc: ietf@ietf.org IETF ietf@ietf.org; oauth WG oa...@ietf.org Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2011 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback Hannes, None of the current OAuth WG document address discovery in any

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback

2011-07-05 Thread Justin Richer
The OpenID Connect folks have been using Simple Web Discovery, which is as I understand it a rough translation of XRD into JSON, with a couple of simplifying changes. (Mike, want to throw your hat in on this one?) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-simple-web-discovery-00 -- Justin On Mon,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback

2011-07-05 Thread Eve Maler
FWIW, the Dynamic OAuth Client Registration proposal made by the User-Managed Access folks: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardjono-oauth-dynreg-00 ...makes use of XRD, hostmeta, and discovery, as does the OAuth-based UMA protocol itself: