Re: [Speechsc] Last Call: (Media Resource Control Protocol Version 2 (MRCPv2)) to Proposed Standard

2011-03-21 Thread Dan Burnett
Thank you. Based on your comments I have made the following changes to section 13.6 in my working copy (which will be reflected in the next draft): - Made reference to RFC 4395 Informative rather than Normative. - Replaced "URL" with "URI" - Added "Status" of "Permanent" - Replaced the "Enco

Re: [Speechsc] Last Call: (Media Resource Control Protocol Version 2 (MRCPv2)) to Proposed Standard

2011-04-19 Thread Slawomir Testowy
Hello, my small comment: The BARGE-IN-OCCURRED method is in few places wrote as BARGE-IN-OCCURED (note missing "R"). I wonder how this could go through all 24 MRCPv2 revisions Regards, Slawek Testowy 2011/3/16 The IESG : > > The IESG has received a request from the Speech Services Control W

Re: [Speechsc] Last Call: (Media Resource Control Protocol Version 2 (MRCPv2)) to Proposed Standard

2011-04-19 Thread Slawomir Testowy
Hi! Some other comments: > 4.2. Managing Resource Control Channels > When the client wants to add a media processing resource to the > session, it issues a SIP re-INVITE transaction. Is it possible to allocate more than one resource of the same type during one SIP dialog? Example in 4.2 shows h

Re: [Speechsc] Last Call: (Media Resource Control Protocol Version 2 (MRCPv2)) to Proposed Standard

2011-10-30 Thread Dan Burnett
On Apr 18, 2011, at 3:10 AM, Slawomir Testowy wrote: > Hi! > > Some other comments: > >> 4.2. Managing Resource Control Channels > >> When the client wants to add a media processing resource to the >> session, it issues a SIP re-INVITE transaction. > > Is it possible to allocate more than one