Double sorry, I meant to sent this only to the cer...@ietf.org list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid
On 10/6/10 2:53 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Sorry about the delayed reply, still catching up on list traffic here...
>
> On 9/22/10 4:11 PM, Henry B. Hotz wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 22,
Sorry about the delayed reply, still catching up on list traffic here...
On 9/22/10 4:11 PM, Henry B. Hotz wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
>> 2. A human user has explicitly agreed to trust a service that
>> provides mappings of source domains to target domai
Marsh Ray wrote:
>
> Martin Rex wrote:
> >
> > Thinking about it, I feel slightly uneasy about some redirects, such as
> > https://gmail.com -> 301 -> https://mail.google.com/mail
> >
> > I think these should never go without a warning.
>
> That bugs me too. Lots of sites do it though, usuall
On 09/22/2010 08:48 PM, Martin Rex wrote:
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
[...] For example the user may trust a dedicated discovery service
or identity service that securely redirects requests from the source
to a target domain.
Thinking about it, I feel slightly uneasy about some redirects, such as
ht
On Sep 22, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 2. A human user has explicitly agreed to trust a service that
> provides mappings of source domains to target domains, such as a
> dedicated discovery service or an identity service that securely
> redirects requests fr
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
>
> [...] For example the user may trust a dedicated discovery service
> or identity service that securely redirects requests from the source
> to a target domain.
Thinking about it, I feel slightly uneasy about some redirects, such as
https://gmail.com -> 301 -> https://
I'd offered to review this version during the TLS session at IETF 78,
but I think I'm going to wait for the next version ;)
spt
Wes Hardaker wrote:
I've reviewed draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-09 and find it a good
document and support it's forward progress. I do have a few comments
tho
On 9/14/10 10:07 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
> I'd offered to review this version during the TLS session at IETF 78,
> but I think I'm going to wait for the next version ;)
Yes, the authors will work to submit a revised I-D soon, based on all
the feedback received so far.
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
h
