On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:00:49PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, David W. Hankins wrote:
> >Now, perhaps RFCs shouldn't read like "Choose your own Adventure"
> >novels.
>
> My problem is that the spec leaves the algorithm completely open.
> There is at least one simple algorit
I haven't seen any replies in this corner of the thread. Apologies
if this has been covered elsehwere.
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 04:27:27PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> I have one major issue with 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP
> Clients', the first issue below. It fails to properly de
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, David W. Hankins wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 04:27:27PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
I have one major issue with 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP
Clients', the first issue below. It fails to properly describe the
threats caused by DHCP clients requesting updating n
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:13:43PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> You need to get sufficiently specific that in practice, the
> implementation of this option is not influencing addressing plans.
> For example if servers tend to get this wrong in a way that makes it
> difficult for me to have multiple
> "Bernie" == Bernie Volz (volz) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bernie> For DHCPv6 servers, depending on policy (such as if it is
Bernie> the only server or if there is a one address/client
Bernie> policy) it may delete everything and add back those that
Bernie> are current or may
tf.org; dhcwg@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call:
> 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed
> Standard]
>
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> > Regarding your one major issue, the up
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
Regarding your one major issue, the updater is NOT the entity that gets
to decide whether to allow any DNS update to occur or not. It is the DNS
server that restricts who can do updates and what they can update.
We're assuming that the most likely e
ber 26, 2005 9:27 AM
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call:
> 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed
> Standard]
>
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, The IESG wrote:
> &
