On Jun 27, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
If we split it into two options, that eliminates the future possibility of
supporting multiple URIs per client. So we will need to take this back to the
GEOPRIV WG to make sure folks are okay with foreclosing that.
The document already says
Hi Ted,
On Jun 22, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
My understanding is that the option is encoded this way both for
extensibility and because the Valid-For parameter is solely a property of
the URI. Surely this is not the only instance
On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
My understanding is that the option is encoded this way both for
extensibility and because the Valid-For parameter is solely a property of the
URI. Surely this is not the only instance of a DHCP option with a sub-option?
What's in the draft
