--- Forwarded Message
To: Michael Richardson
From: Mark Andrews
References: <20130819222037.ga55...@mx1.yitter.info>
<20130822184610.2640.qm...@joyce.lan>
<20130822212337.b37a838cb...@drugs.dv.isc.org> <5559.1377478...@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Dep
Part of the question is whether the IETF is going to work with ICANN, IANA
and the ccTLD to audit delegations for servers that are not RFC 103[45]
compliant and suspend delegations where the servers are not compliant.
* no responding to queries based on query type
* not having a N
On 20 aug 2013, at 21:30, S Moonesamy wrote:
> First of all, I apologize for copying the message to ietf@.
No apology needed.
> I don't know whether to process your comments or the other comments posted on
> dnsext@ as part of the Last Call or not. It is unclear to me as to whether I
> shou
Hi Patrik,
At 11:45 20-08-2013, Patrik Fältström wrote:
The reason why I did not post there at first was
that a) I did not feel I had followed the rules
laid out for discussions [read all messages in
the mailing list archives] and b) the discussion
on the dnsext list was more general on overlo
On 20 aug 2013, at 20:36, S Moonesamy wrote:
> It would be better to have the discussion on the ietf@ mailing list as that's
> the venue which the IESG identified for last Call comments.
Understood, and thanks.
The reason why I did not post there at first was that a) I did not feel I had
foll
Hi Patrik,
I am copying the message to ieft@ as there is an ongoing Last Call.
At 08:28 20-08-2013, Patrik Fältström wrote:
The consensus related to how to fix RFC 4408
will be very rough. That is clear. And I feel
sorry for responsible AD and IESG to be forced
to make a decision that such a
