Hi, Peter,
One minor point, inline...
On May 21, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Hm. The document does indeed assume that extensions to IODEF are
defined in Internet-Drafts, that extension namespaces will be
registered with IANA, and that those namespaces be of the described
On 5/18/12 6:13 AM, Brian Trammell wrote:
Hi, Peter, all,
Many thanks for the comments;
And to you for following up.
replies inline...
Likewise.
On May 17, 2012, at 5:25 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 5/16/12 3:53 PM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the
Hi, Peter, all,
Many thanks for the comments; replies inline...
On May 17, 2012, at 5:25 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 5/16/12 3:53 PM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Managed Incident Lightweight
Exchange WG (mile) to consider the following document:
-
On 5/16/12 3:53 PM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Managed Incident Lightweight
Exchange WG (mile) to consider the following document:
- 'Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF'
draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt as Informational RFC
Although this document does
