--On 13. januar 2006 11:44 -0800 Joe Touch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is my impression, from trying to use it as well. I was troubled by
'yet another embedded text system' that necessitated editing source,
which seemed like a stone-age throwback when I abandoned such systems in
the mid 19
Seconded.
I *have* used it for a production run and whilst it is not perfect it
makes document creation and editing significantly easier than typing
'raw' xml even into a syntax-aware text editor.
It is also very helpful for proof reading and commenting (spell checker
provided).
And the standar
Seconded.
I *have* used it for a production run and whilst it is not perfect it
makes document creation and editing significantly easier than typing
'raw' xml even into a syntax-aware text editor.
It is also very helpful for proof reading and commenting (spell checker
provided).
And the st
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>
>
> --On 13. januar 2006 11:44 -0800 Joe Touch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This is my impression, from trying to use it as well. I was troubled by
>> 'yet another embedded text system' that necessitated editing source,
>> which seemed like a stone-age throw
--On 13. januar 2006 22:40 -0800 Joe Touch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't used it for "production" yet, but it looks wonderful - not
WYSIWYG, but WYSIPU - What You See Is Pretty Useful.
Pretty useful compared to text-editing the source code, yes. Compared to
WYSIWYG, still primitive, u
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>
>
> --On 13. januar 2006 22:40 -0800 Joe Touch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I haven't used it for "production" yet, but it looks wonderful - not
>>> WYSIWYG, but WYSIPU - What You See Is Pretty Useful.
>>
>> Pretty useful compared to text-editing the source
Elwyn Davies wrote:
> Seconded.
>
> I *have* used it for a production run and whilst it is not perfect it
> makes document creation and editing significantly easier than typing
> 'raw' xml even into a syntax-aware text editor.
>
> It is also very helpful for proof reading and commenting (spell
Joe Touch wrote:
Elwyn Davies wrote:
I used to use the Word template but the freedom from hassle of
generating the final documents
I'm not sure what freedom this means; XML still needs to run through a
script, just as Word does.
you can't do it from inside Word and in my experien
