The id-announce mails are defective.
I thought the proposal was to ADD a URL to the HTML/tools or
datatracker versions of the I-D, rather than remove the URL
to the versioned TXT file.
While Barry Leibas suggested Greasemonkey script curiously fixes the
404 error created by the recent change to
As a subscriber of the i-d-annou...@ietf.org list, I generally prefer
reading the HTML version of the draft rather than the TXT version.
I thus often need to manually rewrite the TXT link to fetch the HTML
version of the draft. I can not believe I'm the only one.
Hence, would it be possible to
On 2012-03-06 14:41, Xavier Marjou wrote:
As a subscriber of the i-d-annou...@ietf.org list, I generally prefer
reading the HTML version of the draft rather than the TXT version.
I thus often need to manually rewrite the TXT link to fetch the HTML
version of the draft. I can not believe I'm the
On 2012-03-06 08:51, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2012-03-06 14:41, Xavier Marjou wrote:
As a subscriber of the i-d-annou...@ietf.org list, I generally prefer
reading the HTML version of the draft rather than the TXT version.
I thus often need to manually rewrite the TXT link to fetch the HTML
Even better, also add the XML2RFC output if it's available at the same time:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-name.html
for example, (just picking my own latest draft as an example):
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-websec-extended-origin-02.html
I don't know which drafts get this version
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Simon Perreault
simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca wrote:
On 2012-03-06 08:51, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2012-03-06 14:41, Xavier Marjou wrote:
As a subscriber of the i-d-annou...@ietf.org list, I generally prefer
reading the HTML version of the draft rather than the
On 2012-03-06 14:56, Yoav Nir wrote:
Even better, also add the XML2RFC output if it's available at the same time:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-name.html
for example, (just picking my own latest draft as an example):
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-websec-extended-origin-02.html
+1
I
+1. This will save a few typing and clicks.
Xavier Marjou wrote:
As a subscriber of the i-d-annou...@ietf.org list, I generally prefer
reading the HTML version of the draft rather than the TXT version.
I thus often need to manually rewrite the TXT link to fetch the HTML
version of the draft.
I would be much happier with a link to the datatracker HTML version:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-name/
Would this meet your needs?
Russ
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:41 AM, Xavier Marjou wrote:
As a subscriber of the i-d-annou...@ietf.org list, I generally prefer
reading the HTML version
I would be much happier with a link to the datatracker HTML version:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-name/
Would this meet your needs?
then we can each have our cake and eat it too. but i fear folk may just
want the bright shiny.
randy
___
On 3/6/2012 6:12 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
I would be much happier with a link to the datatracker HTML version:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-name/
+1
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
___
Ietf mailing list
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
I would be much happier with a link to the datatracker HTML version:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-name/
Would this meet your needs?
Yes, it would be fine. From my point of view the two versions are
almost equivalent,
It would be acceptable to me, especially since there's a link from there
to the tools HTML version. (Look for the html link at the top.)
Tony Hansen
On 3/6/2012 9:12 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
I would be much happier with a link to the datatracker HTML version:
With a link like https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-name/ (e.g.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nir-websec-extended-origin/ ),
I will most often then click again on the html top right link. But I'm
fine with it too.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Russ Housley hous...@vigilsec.com
The XML2RFC version is not linked from there. If that was added to the Other
versions field, that would be great.
On Mar 6, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Xavier Marjou wrote:
With a link like https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-name/ (e.g.
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:41 AM, Xavier Marjou wrote:
As a subscriber of the i-d-annou...@ietf.org list, I generally prefer
reading the HTML version of the draft rather than the TXT version.
I thus often need to manually rewrite the TXT link to fetch the HTML
version of the draft. I can not
almost equivalent, this latter maybe is more flexible (at the expense
of one more click, which is negligible)
Re: one more click...
https://datatracker.ietf.org/cookies/
Note the third item.
Barry
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Xavier Marjou
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 5:42 AM
To: IETF Discussion
Subject: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
As a subscriber of the i-d-annou...@ietf.org list, I
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Russ
Housley
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 6:13 AM
To: Xavier Marjou
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
I would be much happier with a
On 2012-03-06 16:26, Yoav Nir wrote:
The XML2RFC version is not linked from there. If that was added to the Other
versions field, that would be great.
...
Indeed. HTMLized plain text is progress over plain text, but properly
generated HTML is better.
But I fear we're getting close to our
On Mar 6, 2012, at 11:44 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2012-03-06 16:26, Yoav Nir wrote:
The XML2RFC version is not linked from there. If that was added to the
Other versions field, that would be great.
...
Indeed. HTMLized plain text is progress over plain text, but properly
generated
Pictures in RFCs?
Come to the RFCFORM BOF to voice opinions on this topic.
Russ
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Not that voicing opinions on this topic has ever done any good. -T
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Russ Housley hous...@vigilsec.com wrote:
Pictures in RFCs?
Come to the RFCFORM BOF to voice opinions on this topic.
Russ
___
Ietf mailing list
Yup, you are not the only one -- this annoyed me sufficiently that I finally
gave
in and wrote a Chrome extension to do this for me.
Basically it watches the address bard and looks for www.ietf.org/id/foo and,
depending on the setting in the options page, will redirect to the Tools or
On Mar 6, 2012, at 7:43 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
Yup, you are not the only one -- this annoyed me sufficiently that I finally
gave
in and wrote a Chrome extension to do this for me.
Basically it watches the address bard and looks for www.ietf.org/id/foo
and,
depending on the setting in the
25 matches
Mail list logo
