Looking for words to express the sense of frustration when you have a bloody
interesting session, you have saved bloody interesting Qs from the floor, you
have people on jabber who want to see the stuff, and the f***$%#^D network
dies on you, so you can't put the stuff into the jabber session at
The ultimate trick would be to have a speech to text recognition software... So whoever is talking appears as text in the conference room...
This would be the lowest bandwidth capable conference system...
Additional question, does jabber uses multicast or anycast for conferencing?
Franck Martin wrote:
The ultimate trick would be to have a speech to text recognition
software... So whoever is talking appears as text in the conference
room...
This would be the lowest bandwidth capable conference system...
Not to mention the most entertaining. :-) Your average
A sinner speaks...I find this is increasing a bad habit to do a
blasts shields up view of my laptop instead of paying attention to
the wgs. I'm personally trying to cut that back, and I'd
recommend to others who are similarly easily addicted to the glow of their
screens that this could be a
Let me say I really like the text conferencing experiment
so far. It's pretty cool to get a chance to have an idea
of what's going on in sessions you can't split yourself
to attend.
It'd be interesting to see more people attending the
text conference; in other (non-IETF) meetings I've seen
Let me say I really like the text conferencing experiment
so far. It's pretty cool to get a chance to have an idea
of what's going on in sessions you can't split yourself
to attend.
thanks. certainly the unexpected result (for me) is that it's really
useful for the attendees --
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 11:10:30AM -0500, Marshall Rose allegedly wrote:
thanks. certainly the unexpected result (for me) is that it's really
useful for the attendees -- initially, i thought this was primarily
going to be a big help for folks who couldn't physically get to the meeting.
I
It's common practice for W3C to use IRC during teleconferences and
face-to-face meetings, from which minutes can be derived. The combination
works pretty well when I have been involved. Jabber seems to work better
than IRC because, on logging in to a conference a record from the
conference
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Leslie Daigle writes:
Let me say I really like the text conferencing experiment
so far. It's pretty cool to get a chance to have an idea
of what's going on in sessions you can't split yourself
to attend.
Indeed.
--Steve Bellovin,
