Of course its true: "no amount of QOS can generate any additional bandwidth"
(That's what Multi Protocol Labeling Switching is for!)
On 1/21/02 3:00 PM, "Dan Kolis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course its true: "no amount of QOS can generate any additional bandwidth"
>
> (That's what Multi Protocol Labeling Switching is for!)
Hmm, wonder if "QOS" here might imply different things ...
Put aside the history where it came f
> (That's what Multi Protocol Labeling Switching is for!)
Shouldn't references to MPLS be surrounded by ... tags?
cheers,
gja
yes.
if pos('',s)>=i then ignoredata:=1 else
if pos('',s)>=i then ignoredata:=0;
At 10:46 AM 1/22/02 +1100, grenville armitage wrote:
>
>> (That's what Multi Protocol Labeling Switching is for!)
>
>Shouldn't references to MPLS be surrounded by ... tags?
>
>cheers,
>gja
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] asks in jest:
>>Of course its true: "no amount of QOS can generate any additional bandwidth"
>But is the converse also true?
Seriously though I say:
Huh? If its free... QoS = not having QoS because everybody's app will ask
for it.
If there is a tarriffed QoS service every pro
