Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-30 Thread Scott Brim
On Sunday, June 30, 2013, Noel Chiappa wrote: > > From: Scott Brim > > > > Please someone find and share the UUCP message where the body said "I > > don't understand the concern about too many message headers." > > I don't know about there being a UUCP one, but here: > > http://www.c

Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-30 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: Scott Brim > Please someone find and share the UUCP message where the body said "I > don't understand the concern about too many message headers." I don't know about there being a UUCP one, but here: http://www.chiappa.net/~jnc/humour/net.header is the ARPANET one.

Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-30 Thread Scott Brim
Please someone find and share the UUCP message where the body said "I don't understand the concern about too many message headers."

RE: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread l.wood
: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility) > From: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) > Yet. PS: I probably should have added a ":-)" to that. Sorry, it's early, the brain's not firing on all cylinders yet,

Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread Michael StJohns
The shortest ietf email was sent at least 20 years ago, consisted of a single "!" as the body. Of course the subject went on for two lines. I forget what the subject was. Mike Sent from my iPad On Jun 29, 2013, at 15:43, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/29/2013 05:28 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: >>

Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread John Levine
In article <51cf38eb.3080...@dougbarton.us> you write: >On 06/29/2013 05:28 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: >> > From: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) >> >> > Yet. >> >> PS: I probably should have added a ":-)" to that. Sorry, it's early, the >> brain's not firing on all cylinders yet, an

Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread Doug Barton
On 06/29/2013 05:28 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > From: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) > Yet. PS: I probably should have added a ":-)" to that. Sorry, it's early, the brain's not firing on all cylinders yet, and I was so entranced by the chance to set the record for the shortest

RE: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) > Yet. PS: I probably should have added a ":-)" to that. Sorry, it's early, the brain's not firing on all cylinders yet, and I was so entranced by the chance to set the record for the shortest ever IETF list e-mail... :-) Noel

RE: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: "Adrian Farrel" > "told not to post" is, AFAIK only achievable through a posting ban, > which you don't seem to have received. Yet. Noel

RE: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread Adrian Farrel
> This message is reply to an author of a new draft under ietf discussion. > If this list is not the correct place to discuss such matter, then the > list's responsible Chair is required to give details of where to > discuss such new work. I have no idea what a "list's responsible chair" is, but t

Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-28 Thread Abdussalam Baryun
This message is reply to an author of a new draft under ietf discussion. If this list is not the correct place to discuss such matter, then the list's responsible Chair is required to give details of where to discuss such new work. + Hi Moonesamy, (t