Alessandro Vesely writes...
Using the Internet is not mandatory: it's free.
Well, that's just plain silly. Does your ISP not charge for access? Mine,
Comcast, charges me over $50 US per month. The Internet should be available
to all, but it cannot be truly free, as the fabric of the Internet
Dean Anderson wrote:
Unfortunately, Todd's delicate sarcasm is probably lost on most...
The method was determined by the IETF. The last call is a public comment
period to gage consensus. There is nothing wrong with the method of the
FSF in participating.
Sure there is Dean - let me propose a
On Feb 9, 2009, at 23:55, Carsten Bormann wrote:
not the way to win friends and impress people
I sincerely apologize for sending a message that has elicited (much
belated) responses from *both* TSG and av8.
I wonder if a shower is enough to get the troll spit off my face.
(I certainly
Carsten Bormann wrote:
http://www.fsf.org/news/reoppose-tls-authz-standard
While I have a lot of sympathy for the cause, I have very little
sympathy for the methods.
I have NO sympathy for the cause.
Rendering a mailing list that might be useful for actually resolving
the issue inoperative
Carsten == Carsten Bormann c...@tzi.org writes:
Carsten http://www.fsf.org/news/reoppose-tls-authz-standard
Carsten While I have a lot of sympathy for the cause, I have very
Carsten little sympathy for the methods. Rendering a mailing list
It's an IETF last call.
This is what
On Feb 10, 2009, at 15:46, Michael Richardson wrote:
The IETF should be *thrilled* that so many people care!
In a world with unlimited time, yes. In the real world, polluting the
discourse by hundreds of more or less unconsidered knee-jerk reactions
just makes sure that *I* can't take
http://www.fsf.org/news/reoppose-tls-authz-standard
While I have a lot of sympathy for the cause, I have very little
sympathy for the methods.
Rendering a mailing list that might be useful for actually resolving
the issue inoperative by a campaign is idiotic.
Somebody from I* (the IETF chair
