Tony Finch wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Keith Moore wrote:
>
>> It's a combination of several things - one, requiring that a domain
>> operate its own mail submission servers which sign their mail (and all
>> that that implies, like maintaining the private keys).
>>
>
> That's just part of
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Keith Moore wrote:
>
> It's a combination of several things - one, requiring that a domain
> operate its own mail submission servers which sign their mail (and all
> that that implies, like maintaining the private keys).
That's just part of running a mail system.
> Two, many d
> Keith,
>
> The DKIM component that establishes reputation is being discussed
> within the DKIM WG. The DKIM signature offers an alternative to the
> IP address which serves as perhaps the only other assured basis for
> reputation. Of course the IP address also shares all of these
> problems.
On Oct 8, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
Tony Finch wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Keith Moore wrote:
the vast majority of domains won't be able to use DKIM without
seriously impairing their users' ability to send mail.
You seem to be assuming that the vast majority of domains have
re
