On Mar 9, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Phill,
I'm not playing with words. The style of 'connection' involved in a
SIP session with proxies is very different from that of a classical
TCP session or a SOAP/HTTP/TCP session, or something using SCTP for
some signalling purpose.
ursday, March 08, 2007 9:57 AM
To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography,
and curbing DDoS threats.)
Ah. Well I always learnt that an IP network was a
connectionless network. Maybe you'd like to define what y
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:41:02AM -0800,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 115 lines which said:
> OK lets try code, at the moment to start up a TCP socket you have
> code of the form:
In C. In every other language I know, it is at a much higher
level. (Even in C, p
AIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:57 AM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography,
> and curbing DDoS threats.)
>
> Ah. Well I always learnt that an IP network was a
&
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
In my opinion, we should never introduce any function that involves the
DNS where:
- the answer is required to be different for different requestors
- the answer has to be different at two times separated by less than
~seconds
- a temporary failure of the resol
On Mar 8, 2007, at 2:13 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2007-03-08 02:06, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
OK I will restate. All connection initiation should be exclusively
mediated through the DNS and only the DNS.
Would that include connections to one's DHCP server, SLP server,
default gat
On 8-Mar-2007, at 10:17, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
A prediction: Sooner or later, IPv4 addresses become so scarce that
renting a colo server with IPv4 becomes more expensive than IPv6.
When that happens, a few NAT-hating spoilsports will set up the
first few IPv6-only servers and a year late
A prediction: Sooner or later, IPv4 addresses become so scarce that
renting a colo server with IPv4 becomes more expensive than IPv6. When
that happens, a few NAT-hating spoilsports will set up the first few
IPv6-only servers and a year later, the transition to IPv6 starts.
I wonder what kind
rand; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography,
and curbing DDoS threats.)
On 2007-03-08 02:06, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
OK I will restate.
All connection initiation should be exclusively mediated
through the DNS and only the DNS.
Would that include connection
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:13 AM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography,
> and curbing DDoS threats.)
>
> On 2007-03-08 02:06, Hallam-Baker, Phil
> One approach for "name" based authorization would place an encoded
> hash label of the domain name being authorized within the
> authorizing
> domain. Client validation can be as simple as resolving the name of
> the client, where this name can then be utilized in conjunction with
> a
On 2007-03-08 02:06, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
OK I will restate.
All connection initiation should be exclusively mediated through the DNS and
only the DNS.
Would that include connections to one's DHCP server, SLP server, default
gateway,
and DNS server?
Hmm...
Brian
--On 7. mars 2007 17:06 -0800 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
OK I will restate.
All connection initiation should be exclusively mediated through the DNS
and only the DNS.
OK, I'll restate too.
In my opinion, we should never introduce any function that involves the DNS
Wednesday, March 07, 2007 6:01 PM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and
> curbing DDoS threats.)
>
> Here I was thinking that the DNS needs to be an useful name
> lookup service for the Internet to function,
On Mar 7, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
Here I was thinking that the DNS needs to be an useful name lookup
service for the Internet to function, and now PHB tells me it's a
signalling layer.
Either I have seriously misunderstood the nature of "signalling",
seriously mi
Here I was thinking that the DNS needs to be an useful name lookup service
for the Internet to function, and now PHB tells me it's a signalling layer.
Either I have seriously misunderstood the nature of "signalling", seriously
misunderstood the nature of the DNS, or I have reason to dislike thi
16 matches
Mail list logo