TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 2:00 PM
To: Henning G. Schulzrinne
Cc: Keith Moore; Johnny Eriksson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Diacritical application in the DNS
Henning wrote:
> And they would insist that something like
>
> 180.035.069.037
>
Henning wrote:
> And they would insist that something like
>
> 180.035.069.037
>
> would spell 1-800-Flowers and try to reserve an IP address based on that
> name.
> --
Believe it or not, the SRI NIC did get at least one request for a vanity
IP address around 1988-89. As your example notes, t
>p.s. the lawyers wouldn't give up so easily...they would simply
>insist that we support IP addresses with octet values greater than 255.
Perhaps it would save us all a lot of grief if we just gave in and
assigned them that address space now. How about moving all lawyers to the
666.0.0.0 subne
Keith Moore wrote:
>
> > If easy-to-type was the original problem we could do away with DNS
> > altogether and just use IP addresses everywhere, that could even get
> > rid of a lot of lawyers...
>
> if it would really get rid of lawyers, it would be well worth it...
>
> Keith
>
> p.s. the law
> If easy-to-type was the original problem we could do away with DNS
> altogether and just use IP addresses everywhere, that could even get
> rid of a lot of lawyers...
if it would really get rid of lawyers, it would be well worth it...
Keith
p.s. the lawyers wouldn't give up so easily...they w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Kolis) wrote:
> 123.34.56.67 has got to be easier to enter than www.bq--abzw55tnn5zq.se
Yes, but the problem is that the first one represents an IP address,
which is at the addressing level, and can change, while the second
one is at the naming level, as a synonyme to the
At 7:06 PM -0500 12/5/00, Dan Kolis wrote:
>Now we are getting down to the nuts and bolts
No, we're not. This is a long re-hash of unfinished discussions
happening in the IDN Working Group. As was requested earlier in this
thread, please go read the archives of the IDN WG, and if you have
some
Greetings,
Martin Duerst [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It might be usable as a poor man's ASCII equivalent,
but I strongly doubt that anybody will want to have
it on the Latin side of their name card.
Patrik [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I would, because I know that people in many parts of the world don't
