Brian, Avri, Allison, Spencer and Adrian: Thank you for your feedback!
Kurtis is off on holidays now, so I'll be taking on the job of integrating
your comments with the text of the announcement.
We're aiming to get it out on Monday (Friday proved over-ambitious).
Thanks again!
Harald,
Perhaps I'm the only one for whom the schedule on this has
prevented comments: the IETF is not my full-time job and other
priorities took over the last week or two. But I have finally
had the opportunity to browse through the comments today. I
find most of them interesting and
jck sed:
Personally, I think I'd be happier with a
professionally-conducted search, but YMMD (and probably does).
I agree (fwiw)
I suggested directly to the IASA TT but did not get a positive respose so
I'll suggest here - I'd sure like to have a professional in the field
of looking for
I have no objection to having a professional look over the job
description. That is probably a good idea.
A full professional search is in my opinion not warranted or useful. I
have worked with a number of executive search firms on senior level
searches. They are very useful if what you
I also agree.
If we are looking for an executive-level person capable of serving as
top-level management for a multi-million dollar activity, I think
that a professional executive search would be worthwhile.
Margaret
At 5:23 PM -0500 12/19/04, Scott Bradner wrote:
jck sed:
Personally, I think
Kurt, all,
Sorry these comments are so late. I hope they will be read,
though, since I've been deployed on so many IETF operations...
I reviewed the BCP draft on the IAD role, and what I think the IAD position
should be like. My major issue with the job description is that it
makes the IAD too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
please find below the draft call for applications for the IAD position.
The current timeline for moving forward is as follows
DEC 18 Send out call for applications to
o IETF-Announce list
o ISOC announcement
and qualifications a
cop-out? You might say expected to be in the range...
Adrian
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 9:18 AM
Subject: Draft version of the IAD job announcement from the IASA TT
Is Salary levels commensurate with experience and qualifications a
cop-out? You might say expected to be in the range...
Adrian
Agree with Adrian here - commensurate makes sense when you hire
several people with a range of experience, or when you are waiting to
see who actually applies before
The current timeline for moving forward is as follows
DEC 18 Send out call for applications to
o IETF-Announce list
o ISOC announcement lists
o NANOG, SANOG, NORDNOG, AFNOG, etc
o Ask RIRs to forward to their respective announcement lists
That's pretty tight... 24
On 16 dec 2004, at 04.18, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
The IETF Administrative Entity
Isn't it the transition team that is seeking the IAD at this point?
is seeking a highly capable individual
to serve as Administrative Director. You will report to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
