Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns

2009-02-25 Thread John Sullivan
Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org writes: At 12:28 PM -0500 2/11/09, John Sullivan wrote: The Free Software Foundation and the GNU Project oppose publication of Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions (draft-housley-tls-authz-extns) as a proposed standard. We do not think that

Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns

2009-02-22 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
John, John Sullivan wrote: The Free Software Foundation and the GNU Project oppose publication of Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions (draft-housley-tls-authz-extns) as a proposed standard. We do not ... With the patent issue, i totally agree with you John. Personally i

Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns

2009-02-13 Thread Sam Hartman
John == John Sullivan jo...@fsf.org writes: John The Licensing Declaration starts out right: RedPhone Security hereby asserts that the techniques for sending and receiving authorizations defined in TLS Authorizations Extensions (version

Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns

2009-02-13 Thread ned+ietf
... I'm sorry, I don't see this at all. I appreciate that you quoted the text in question. However I don't see anything in the language you quote that applies differently to either users or developers. Well, there's something of an exemption for developers producing generic uilding block

RE: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns

2009-02-13 Thread Powers Chuck-RXCP20
Hartman Cc: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns ... I'm sorry, I don't see this at all. I appreciate that you quoted the text in question. However I don't see anything in the language you quote that applies differently to either users or developers

FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns

2009-02-11 Thread John Sullivan
The Free Software Foundation and the GNU Project oppose publication of Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions (draft-housley-tls-authz-extns) as a proposed standard. We do not think that RedPhone Security's 1026 disclosure filing provides sufficient assurance to free software

Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns

2009-02-11 Thread Willie Gillespie
I don't know anything about patents and how they all work -- so I am probably speaking out of place. Is it possible to just have RedPhone re-issue the Licensing Declaration with better wording? Willie John Sullivan wrote: The Free Software Foundation and the GNU Project oppose publication

Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns

2009-02-11 Thread Paul Hoffman
At 12:28 PM -0500 2/11/09, John Sullivan wrote: The Free Software Foundation and the GNU Project oppose publication of Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions (draft-housley-tls-authz-extns) as a proposed standard. We do not think that RedPhone Security's 1026 disclosure filing