Since there's been so much discussion here of IPv6 here, I thought
I'd mention a recent post on CircleID.com called "Examining Actual
State of IPv6 Deployment":
http://www.circleid.com/posts/81166_actual_state_ipv6_deployment/
The article is by Thomas Kuehne and is a "quick-and-dirty" stud
I think that's a pretty bizarre way to measure IPv6 deployment. The
_last_ applications to support IPv6 will be the widely popular apps that
depend on an extensive infrastructure of servers that are currently
associated with IPv4. Email and the web both fall into this category.
And as long as a s
Dan York skrev:
> Since there's been so much discussion here of IPv6 here, I thought I'd
> mention a recent post on CircleID.com called "Examining Actual State
> of IPv6 Deployment":
>
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/81166_actual_state_ipv6_deployment/
>
> The article is by Thomas Kuehne and is a
if you read the ARIN statement on IPv6, you will find that Keith
is describing the story of how to cook a frog. soon, (pick your
favorite study) all IPv4 space will be allocated. For folks who
need IP access after that time, IPv6 will be available. Its those
(ones and twos) who will need t
