On 25 Oct 2012, at 01:25, Michael Richardson mcr+i...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Sabahattin Gucukoglu listse...@me.com wrote:
SG * text/paragraphs (or whatever), a completely different identity that
violates the length limits
SG Apple Mail and Microsoft use this text/paragraphs.
Do you
Randall Gellens ra...@qti.qualcomm.com wrote:
Warning: this message was generated by Apple Mail.
RG But not using Format=Flowed.
RG This reflects a misunderstanding of Format=Flowed. Properly
RG generated F=F has lines of no more than 78 characters. One of
RG the primary
Sabahattin Gucukoglu listse...@me.com wrote:
SG Let's clear up the confusion. I made two mistakes, firstly by
SG calling this F/F semantics when what I mean is some sort of
SG long-line-aware reflowing and quoting. We'll have to find a name
SG for it. The other mistake was to call plain text
At 11:42 AM +0100 10/19/12, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
Warning: this message was generated by Apple Mail.
But not using Format=Flowed.
On 16 Oct 2012, at 03:46, Randall Gellens ra...@qti.qualcomm.com wrote:
At 9:12 AM -0400 9/5/12, Michael Richardson {quigon} wrote:
Maybe I'm also
Warning: this message was generated by Apple Mail. I just can't stop my
insatiable appetite for shiny things. :-( [1]
On 16 Oct 2012, at 03:46, Randall Gellens ra...@qti.qualcomm.com wrote:
At 9:12 AM -0400 9/5/12, Michael Richardson {quigon} wrote:
Maybe I'm also concerned because many
On 19 Oct 2012, at 17:45, Randall Gellens ra...@qti.qualcomm.com wrote:
At 11:42 AM +0100 10/19/12, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
Warning: this message was generated by Apple Mail.
But not using Format=Flowed.
Precisely.
On 16 Oct 2012, at 03:46, Randall Gellens ra...@qti.qualcomm.com wrote:
At 9:12 AM -0400 9/5/12, Michael Richardson {quigon} wrote:
Maybe I'm also concerned because many in the former elite have
moved to Apple Mail, and it seems that it is bug
compatible with Outlook in it's assumption that format=flowed is
the default, an act which destroys email quoting, and
