Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))

2005-10-18 Thread Dean Anderson
Do you have any examples of a conversation that I hindered? In fact, it is my email that is being hindered, for speaking on topic. more inline On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Sandy Wills wrote: > Last, however, in order to _remain_ in the IETF, you have to have a > personality that accepts that you a

Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))

2005-10-17 Thread Doug Ewell
Sandy Wills wrote: > Dean, there's a simple solution to your needs. Simply register > the domain "DeanAndersonIsWonderfulAndAlwaysRight.org", and start your > own fan club. You'll get to write the charter and bylaws, and you can > put in them whatever clauses you want, like "Dean always has

Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))

2005-10-17 Thread Sandy Wills
Dean Anderson wrote: For the time being, I am withholding release of my response pending advice of my attorney. As I see it, there are some simple requirements for "joining" the IETF. You must be human, or at least a convincing facsimile when using email. As far as I can tell, Dean meets

Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))

2005-10-17 Thread Dean Anderson
This is not my response to the PR Action. Mr. Mendez raises a valid point of jurisprudence regarding the fairness of this PR-Action. The point he raises is called "double jeopardy". The US recognizes this principle in criminal court cases. This is not a criminal court case, but it is similar in t

Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))

2005-10-17 Thread Alexis Turner
Cual es? Si el Last Call fue correcto en la primera vez, tiene ningun discordanica? O aun dice que el Last Call no tiene razon? Presenta dos declaraciones, pero los dos finjan que el otro no exista. Parece que el EEUU es mal pase lo que pase. Es posible que eso es su punto? (Which is it? If t

Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))

2005-10-17 Thread Dave Singer
Eduardo, I think I may be misunderstanding you, and if so I apologize. As I understand it, the original announcement of the 'last call' was not sent in strict accord with the agreed procedures, in that it used the wrong mailing list. As a result it has now been sent to the correct mailing l

Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))

2005-10-17 Thread Eduardo Mendez
2005/10/17, Noel Chiappa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> From: Eduardo Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> There are other countries > > Please keep the nationalism out of this. The IETF is not a country. Mr. Noel, I am sorry. There is nothing nationalism. (Which nationalism?) The IETF is a subsidiar

Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))

2005-10-17 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: Eduardo Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There are other countries Please keep the nationalism out of this. The IETF is not a country. Noel ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))

2005-10-17 Thread Eduardo Mendez
I corrected error (underlined). Apologies. -- Forwarded message -- From: Eduardo Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 17-oct-2005 16:27 Subject: Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning Dean Anderson (reissued)) To: David Kessens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005