Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Keith Moore wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
If I am reading this correctly the UK Centre for the Protection of
National Infrastructure
wants the IETF (or some other body) to produce a companion document to
the IETF specifications that discusses the security aspects and
Keith, Joel,
It's difficult to imagine that these things could be adequately captured
in a static document, for TCP or any other protocol, because new threats
and countermeasures continue to be identified decades after the base
protocol is well-settled. Maybe something like an expanded version
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Keith Moore wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
If I am reading this correctly the UK Centre for the Protection of
National Infrastructure
wants the IETF (or some other body) to produce a companion document to
the IETF specifications that discusses the security aspects
If I am reading this correctly the UK Centre for the Protection of
National Infrastructure
wants the IETF (or some other body) to produce a companion document
to the IETF specifications that discusses the security aspects and
implications of the protocols, identifies the existing
Keith Moore wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
If I am reading this correctly the UK Centre for the Protection of
National Infrastructure
wants the IETF (or some other body) to produce a companion document to
the IETF specifications that discusses the security aspects and
implications of the
