Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06

2010-09-14 Thread Richard L. Barnes
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06 Revi

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06

2010-09-15 Thread Alfred Hönes
Richard, in your Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data, archived at http://www.IETF.ORG/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg63667.html, you argue against the "Updates 793" in the subject draft. The issue with RFC 793 and Urgent Pointer is that this STD contains apparently contradictory verb

RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06

2010-09-15 Thread Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
eview of draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06 Richard, in your Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data, archived at http://www.IETF.ORG/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg63667.html, you argue against the "Updates 793" in the subject draft. The issue with RFC 793 and Urgent Pointer i