I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-lisp-lig-04
Reviewer: Mary B
Thanks for the detailed review - you caught some good stuff. Most of this makes
essence but we should probably talk about usage of 2119 language.
On Aug 9, 2011, at 16:05 , Mary Barnes wrote:
> simple
> ===
>
> Document: draft
fwiw - the author of 2119 thinks that less is more when it comes to the use of
these terms
see, as Cullen points out, Section 6
but there is a balance - for example, if you define a structure and say that
all fields are required, it is redundant to
use MUST with each example of using the struct
Someone might want to point this out to the IESG then, as that has not been
my recent experience. Not even for structures or definition of elements -
it was suggested that the use of the terms mandatory and optional (which I
thought was quite precise when defining data elements) needed to be rewor
