Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erx-09 (-10)

2008-02-20 Thread Lakshminath Dondeti
Hi Pasi, all Following up on this, I think ERX-11 addresses all of Pasi's comments. I have previously added (in v10) clarifying text to address the lock-step issue based on Bernard's suggestion in his detailed review. I have now added a section on lower layer considerations. The channel bind

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erx-09 (-10)

2008-02-19 Thread Lakshminath Dondeti
On 2/19/2008 4:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have just scanned through version -10 of this draft, posted > couple of hours ago. > > This version addresses my comments 5 and 6; and comments 4 and 10 > are obsolete since the text I commented has been removed. The > remaining comments are stil

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erx-09 (-10)

2008-02-19 Thread Pasi.Eronen
I have just scanned through version -10 of this draft, posted couple of hours ago. This version addresses my comments 5 and 6; and comments 4 and 10 are obsolete since the text I commented has been removed. The remaining comments are still valid. One additional comment for version -10: 16) Sect