I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-a
rg
> Cc: gen-...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
e see replies inline.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 12:33 AM
To: re...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analy...@tools.ietf.org
Cc: gen-...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analy
On 11/05/2013 04:58, Stig Venaas wrote:
> On 5/10/2013 8:12 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> Thanks Bing -
>>
>> The updates make the document better, and I appreciate the resolution of
>> referencing Tim's expired draft.
>
> So the solution is to not reference it? I see the name of the draft is
> ment
On 5/10/2013 8:12 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
Thanks Bing -
The updates make the document better, and I appreciate the resolution of
referencing Tim's expired draft.
So the solution is to not reference it? I see the name of the draft is
mentioned in the acknowledgments as:
[draft-chown-v6ops-ren
ietf.org; draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analy...@tools.ietf.org;
> gen-...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt
> (updated for -07)
>
> Thanks Bing -
>
> The updates make the document better, and I appreciate the resol
iginal Message-
>> From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com]
>> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:13 PM
>> To: Liubing (Leo)
>> Cc: re...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analy...@tools.ietf.org;
>> gen-...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Gen-art tel
