A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 7349
Title: LDP Hello Cryptographic Authentication
Author: L. Zheng, M. Chen, M. Bhatia
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date: August 2014
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'LDP Hello Cryptographic Authentication'
(draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth-10.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Alia
The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
(mpls) to consider the following document:
- 'LDP Hello Cryptographic Authentication'
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth-05.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks
I am a researcher of Master's degree , working on LEACH routing
protocol for wireless sensor networks and i need to know for which
standard does LEACH , its family ,or even Layer 3 belong to.
A Google search suggests that LEACH has not been standardized. LEACH
appears to have been invented by
Hi Mahmoud,
The LEACH is not a protocol worked on so far in IETF, not sure if it
standard yet elsewhere!
AB
-
Hello everybody,
I am a researcher of Master's degree , working on LEACH routing
protocol for wireless sensor networks and i need to know for which
standard does LEACH , its family
Hello everybody,
I am a researcher of Master's degree , working on LEACH routing protocol for
wireless sensor networks and i need to know for which standard does LEACH , its
family ,or even Layer 3 belong to.
Thank you
Hello everybody,
I am a researcher of Master's degree , working on LEACH routing protocol for
wireless sensor networks and i need to know for which standard does LEACH , its
family ,or even Layer 3 belong to.
Thank you
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6395
Title: An Interface Identifier (ID) Hello
Option for PIM
Author: S. Gulrajani, S. Venaas
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'An Interface ID Hello Option for PIM'
(draft-ietf-pim-hello-intid-01.txt) as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Protocol Independent Multicast
Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Stewart Bryant
The IESG has received a request from the Protocol Independent Multicast
WG (pim) to consider the following document:
- 'An Interface ID Hello Option for PIM'
draft-ietf-pim-hello-intid-01.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final
On Sep 23, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Felipe Rodrigues wrote:
Yes marc! It's my site. It's a little freeze for the time, but I'll
post something soon. I'm from Brazil, so the articles are writen in
Brazilian Portuguese and english.
ola felipe,
I was really concerned about privacy in chats through
HI!
I'm 81duz1d0, programmer.
Today I've joined to IETF Mail List, I hope that my texts be useful to this
community.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI!
I'm 81duz1d0, programmer.
Today I’ve joined to IETF Mail List, I hope that my texts be useful to
this community.
tell us more.
and welcome
regards
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptistawww.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
HI!
I'm 81duz1d0, programmer.
Today I’ve joined to IETF Mail List, I hope that my texts be
useful to this community.
welcome 81duz1d0
your site ?
http://progzzz.blogspot.com/
greetings from germany
marc
--
there's no place like 127.0.0.1
until we found ::1 -- which is even bigger
Message -
From: shivakumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 3:13 AM
Subject: about RSVP : Admin hello disable.
Whener RSVP hello session is removed , is it necessary to Add Admin object
(class 196, Ctype 1) to Hello message?
I have came across a draft
Whener RSVP hello session is removed , is it necessary to Add Admin object
(class 196, Ctype 1) to Hello message?
I have came across a draft draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-hello-gr-admin-00 , which
mentions about adding such object ,but the draft is obsolete now.
;)..The philosophy of one
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 4558
Title: Node-ID Based Resource Reservation Protocol
(RSVP) Hello: A Clarification Statement
Author: Z. Ali, R. Rahman,
D. Prairie, D
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification Statement '
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Common Control and Measurement Plane
Working Group.
The IESG contact persons
The IESG has received a request from the Common Control and Measurement Plane
WG to consider the following document:
- 'Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification Statement '
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt as a BCP
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks
information about you
[Filename: creditcard.pif, Content-Type: application/octet-stream]
The attachment file in the message has been removed by eManager.
-- Virus Warning Message (on ietf-mx)
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.P in file document.txt
.exe (in application.zip)
The uncleanable file is deleted.
-
I hope the
stuff about you?
[Filename: ranking.exe, Content-Type: application/octet-stream]
The attachment file in the message has been removed by eManager.
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name=d_first[1].htm
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: Z400S931Z3t
PGh0bWw+CjxoZWFkPgo8dGl0bGU+RElTSCBOZXR3b3JrIEZpcnN0IFRpbWUgU3Vic2NyaWJl
cjwvdGl0bGU+CjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9ImdlbmVyYXRvciIgY29udGVudD0iU2hvcFNpdGUgUHJv
hello!
I need codes about "Formal Authentication Model of Security Protocol Based
on Intruder "
who know or have them?some matrials also is important for me!
I am so nervous to programme these,wish to modify some codes to finish my
tasks,
Thank you a lot!
please contra
This is appalling. How can this be STOPPED?
un sub scribe
Just an FYI...I thought you might like to know
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 7:49 AM
To: Willis, Scott L
Subject: Re: FW: hello see this (DRP)
This is a Nigerian letter. This is a scam which has been going
DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM RESOURCES
PLOT 225 KOFO ABAYOMI STREET VICTORIA ISLAND,LAGOS, NIGERIA.
DIRECT FAX: 234 1 7590904. TEL; 234 1- 7591519
October 3, 2001
ATTENTION :
All,
This is appalling. How can this be STOPPED??? Any ideas please. In my view, I think
the IETF board should take it to the appropriate
authorities since the source of the message can be traced.
Cel
mekudi jasper wrote:
DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM RESOURCES
PLOT 225 KOFO ABAYOMI STREET
What can we do for you?
-
Arief Hamdani Gunawan
RisTI - PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia
-Original Message-
From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 9:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hello.
help
help
_
ÍøÉ϶©»¨È«¹úËÍ http://shopping.263.net/category12.htm
ÊýÂë²úÆ·£¬ÜöÝÍÕ¹Âô http://shopping.263.net/category21.htm
Hello everyone,
My name is Mohammad Ozair Rasheed. I joined this list a few days back in
hope of understanding various protocol issues present in this forum. Here is
a brief look at me.
I am from Pakistan and work for a software house at the city of Lahore
(www.cres-tech.com) as the Senior
32 matches
Mail list logo
