Having been on several nomcoms, served as chair, and as a
liaison/advisor, I fully agree with Fred. I think we see a thread
such as this (i.e., re: confidentiality of nomcom feedback, willing
nominees, non-willing nominees, who's re-upping, who's not,
etc..) pretty much every year about this tim
Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
> The way I see it though is that the process and the mechanisms
> were not discussed within the community. Conventional wisdom
> says that security protocols/mechanisms designed without proper
> peer review tend to be broken. A few people I have spoken to
> seem to th
At 06:59 PM 11/5/2006, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
Confidentiality and the Nomcom has always been an interesting topic
to me. Some want everything to be secretive. I think that the more
stuff we try to keep secret the harder it is. Personally, the holy
grail is potential negative feedback the
Fred Baker wrote:
On Nov 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
Frankly the feedback does not need to seen by anyone other than the
voting members IMO. What do others think?
So your point is that the chair of the nominating committee should not
know who the candidates are?
You
On Nov 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
Frankly the feedback does not need to seen by anyone other than the
voting members IMO. What do others think?
So your point is that the chair of the nominating committee should
not know who the candidates are?
You might consider the t
I am not (yet) going to get into who specifically has access to what
kind of information and how, but instead asking a meta question about
whether or not people care about confidentiality, and to what extent.
I would also like to bring back the attention to the subject of my
email "the informa
At 08:12 PM 11/5/2006, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
> It might be worthwhile for the community to know the feedback
> is known to
> * the voting members of the nomcom
> * nomcom current and past year's chair
> * the 3 liaison members
> * the tools team (some of them are IE
on 2006-11-05 18:59 Lakshminath Dondeti said the following:
[snip first part of message]
> It might be worthwhile for the community to know the feedback is known to
[snip other parties]
> * the tools team (some of them are IETF contributors)
This is incorrect. The feedback is encrypted (wi
Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
> It might be worthwhile for the community to know the feedback
> is known to
> * the voting members of the nomcom
> * nomcom current and past year's chair
> * the 3 liaison members
> * the tools team (some of them are IETF contributors)
> * whoever maintains the nom
Confidentiality and the Nomcom has always been an interesting topic
to me. Some want everything to be secretive. I think that the more
stuff we try to keep secret the harder it is. Personally, the holy
grail is potential negative feedback the community may want to
provide to the nomcom. In
10 matches
Mail list logo
