Joe Abley wrote:
I've always wondered what the designation for your information
adds to an RFC that is already labelled informational.
Me too. I hope to find out :-)
Try FYI 1 = RFC 1150, but it doesn't exactly answer the question ;-)
___
Ietf
On 2008-01-18 17:13, Joe Abley wrote:
On 17-Jan-2008, at 18:50, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Added sentences to section 8.1 explaining that BCPs and FYIs are sub-
series of Informational RFCs.
Namely:
The sub-series of FYIs and
BCPs are comprised of Informational documents in the
On 18-Jan-2008, at 21:48, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I've always wondered what the designation for your information adds
to an RFC that is already labelled informational.
Me too. I hope to find out :-)
Joe
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
Added sentences to section 8.1 explaining that BCPs and FYIs are sub-
series of Informational RFCs.
Namely:
The sub-series of FYIs and
BCPs are comprised of Informational documents in the sense of the
enumeration above, with special tagging applied.
That's certainly true
On 2008-01-18 13:14, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 12:50 PM +1300 1/18/08, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Added sentences to section 8.1 explaining that BCPs and FYIs are
sub-
series of Informational RFCs.
Namely:
The sub-series of FYIs and
BCPs are comprised of Informational
Paul Hoffman skrev:
At 12:50 PM +1300 1/18/08, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Added sentences to section 8.1 explaining that BCPs and FYIs
are sub-
series of Informational RFCs.
Namely:
The sub-series of FYIs and
BCPs are comprised of Informational documents in the sense of
At 12:50 PM +1300 1/18/08, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Added sentences to section 8.1 explaining that BCPs and FYIs are sub-
series of Informational RFCs.
Namely:
The sub-series of FYIs and
BCPs are comprised of Informational documents in the sense of the
enumeration
Harald Alvestrand wrote:
[BCP}
I long ago proposed splitting the series into the two effective
subseries it has - process documents and forcefully recommended
advice to operators/implementors - but that obvious move is Just
Too Much Of A Hassle
...it could be more straight forward than
At 3:52 AM +0100 1/18/08, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Or maybe TAO is the IETF user manual and public FAQ, while IONs
not limited to Procdoc are the reference manual for folks trying
to figure out why user manual and implementation are different.
Something along that line, yes. The Tao really
On 17-Jan-2008, at 18:50, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Added sentences to section 8.1 explaining that BCPs and FYIs are
sub-
series of Informational RFCs.
Namely:
The sub-series of FYIs and
BCPs are comprised of Informational documents in the sense of the
enumeration above, with
10 matches
Mail list logo
