I want to somewhat retract my earlier statement on how good the audio quality
has been.
After being very impressed with the quality on many sessions,
this morning I attempted to be (inter)active in a session.
I discovered that the delay was intolerably long,
over 5 seconds one-way delay between
Hi Yakoov,
live sessions provided by Meetecho adopt exactly the approach you
propose (RTSP 8K flow). I think that the objective of the high quality
mp3 feed is also in line with what you suggest.
Cheers,
Simon
Il 16/11/2011 09:26, Yaakov Stein ha scritto:
I want to somewhat retract my
On 11/16/11 16:26 , Yaakov Stein wrote:
I want to somewhat retract my earlier statement on how good the audio quality
has been.
After being very impressed with the quality on many sessions,
this morning I attempted to be (inter)active in a session.
I discovered that the delay was
On 11/14/2011 3:07 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
Within expected paramaters... it's not like I generated MOS scores, but
they all sound pretty much like they should.
OK, I think I get you. All streams appear to be of reasonably good quality.
And yet you grew up listening to NASA mission control
As someone listening in remotely, and with a background in audio quality
measurement,
the audio quality was consistently very good.
Y(J)S
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Greetings! some updates associated with current conditions.
Notes:
* Streaming has commenced.
* All streams appear nominal audio quality wise.
* Archives streams will appear in the ietf repository
http://www.ietf.org/audio/ietf82/
* The plenaries will be streamed on the channel
* All streams appear nominal audio quality wise.
What is this meant to mean?
Barry
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On 11/14/11 13:22 , Barry Leiba wrote:
* All streams appear nominal audio quality wise.
What is this meant to mean?
Within expected paramaters... it's not like I generated MOS scores, but
they all sound pretty much like they should.
Barry
___
* All streams appear nominal audio quality wise.
What is this meant to mean?
Within expected paramaters... it's not like I generated MOS scores, but
they all sound pretty much like they should.
OK, I think I get you. All streams appear to be of reasonably good quality.
I was confused,
On 11/14/11 15:07 , Barry Leiba wrote:
* All streams appear nominal audio quality wise.
What is this meant to mean?
Within expected paramaters... it's not like I generated MOS scores, but
they all sound pretty much like they should.
OK, I think I get you. All streams appear to be of
10 matches
Mail list logo
