I would tend to agree the weather points don't need to be documented.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Jordi,
All of the points, IMO, are over specifying the issues. I wouldn't really care
to see any of these points documented.
John
>
> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/10/22 Sat AM 03:05:59 EEST
> To: "ietf@ietf.org"
> Subje
Hi all,
I'm trying to summarize and comment the different threads that have received
some input on this document during the last days.
This is the 1st thread (others to follow), related to weather conditions for
the venue.
I think, reading the different comments, the conclusion is that:
1) Outd
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> I'm not so sure about 1. Other comments ?
Irrelevant as long as you're not planning an outdoor meeting,
and if above 0° C won't cause avalanches (= your 2nd point).
But smokers forced to meet outdoors could be a Bad Thing. ;-)
> 1) Outdoor temperature during the meeting above 0 degrees
> Centigrade and below 40.
>
> My personal view is that 2 and 3 are very important, but I'm not
> so sure about 1. Other comments ?
Jordi,
I find it hard to believe that outside temperatures are that important
especially considering the s
My reading of the original thread was that outdoor temporary
was really a non-issue to almost everyone. Delete 1.
2 is obvious, delete.
We had some discussion about 3, but I think it could
be better summarized as "Ensure that the site under
consideration has adequate air-conditioning and/or heat
> Conversación: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria - weather conditions and
> related
> Asunto: Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria - weather conditions and
> related
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to summarize and comment the different threads that have received
>
