--On onsdag, juni 04, 2003 11:54:03 -0400 Dean Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
inline. I apologize in advance for so many questions. I have looked on the
ISOC site, and IAB site, and other pages to find the answers to these
questions.
since most of your questions can easily be answered "no"
You made my point. Cisco was "justly and publicly" criticized with
"near-universal-derision" for not complying with the standard. Most
companies want to avoid that. False derision is actionable in many
jurisdictions.
--Dean
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed,
On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:54:03 EDT, Dean Anderson said:
> Implementors are not the only users of standards. Businsess seek to
> purchase and sell "Standard" Services, and may receive just and public
> criticism for not providing the services they claim to provide. In some
> jurisdictions, this coul
inline. I apologize in advance for so many questions. I have looked on the
ISOC site, and IAB site, and other pages to find the answers to these
questions.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>
>
> --On tirsdag, juni 03, 2003 17:28:55 -0400 Dean Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote
--On tirsdag, juni 03, 2003 17:28:55 -0400 Dean Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
You indicated that my criticism was incorrect regarding Mr. Klensin's
understanding of the standards process in regards to the description of
the current SMTP Standard. So, now I am confused, and would like to
You indicated that my criticism was incorrect regarding Mr. Klensin's
understanding of the standards process in regards to the description of
the current SMTP Standard. So, now I am confused, and would like to learn
how to correctly evalute the status of IETF Standards.
The following question se
