On Jul 9, 2009, at 10:01, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
There are two things that together make it completely impossible to
adopt more working languages [...]
My point wasn't to argue that we should consider working in non-
English languages, but simply to explain why it's reasonable to rule
On 9 jul 2009, at 18:15, james woodyatt wrote:
B) is open for debate: what precisely should be the set of primary
natural languages used in IETF documents? Should it continue to be
English only? I'd very much prefer to see *that* discussion
vigorously deferred while our archival format co
