There is an AODV test running but it requires, uh, running AODV. See:
http://moment.cs.ucsb.edu/aodv-ietf
It actually has nothing to do with the evil that is MSFT's ad hoc. And,
it also works if you get everything configured correctly.
However, it is currently shutdown until the wireless
It sounds to me like this at least as likely to be caused by
cluelessness as malice. If we eventually want a world where networks
this big are everywhere, we can't afford to blame the users for
cluelessness when those networks break, especially since the average
user in that future will be at
As for those people who run around with their cards in ad hoc mode,
yes,
especially here, they should know better.
One problem may be those helpful features where the OS is switching
to ad-hoc when there is no base station to be seen. In Mac OS X 10.2,
you can disable that (switch off Allow
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:55:59 EST, Nathaniel Borenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And if it's this easy to mess up maliciously, well maybe we should
be commissioning an IETF police force that will develop the tools to
track down the offending laptops in real time and pour diet Coke in
: Re: IETF58 - Network Status - 12:05PM Local Time
It sounds to me like this at least as likely to be caused by
cluelessness as malice. If we eventually want a world where networks
this big are everywhere, we can't afford to blame the users for
cluelessness when those networks break
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Kevin C. Almeroth wrote:
But the result is independent of whether people are running in ad hoc
mode... it has to do with AP tuning, etc.
I just noticed that where I'm sitting in the lobby, one can pick up 2
networks: ietf58 and hhonors.
Neither one charges for SSH
wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 11 09:53:18 2003
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IETF58 - Network Status - 12:05PM Local Time
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:28:51 -0600
X-Authenticated-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Processed: consulintel.es
We currently have three external routes, all are up.
Wireless has been deployed to the hotel, and we are still working to get good
signal coverage to the Brit's Pub. We have a solution that will start to get
executed later this afternoon. That should dramatically increase the
coverage in
Hi,
We have been getting some reports of rooted machines (IETF Attendee machines,
not IETF NOC Machines) that are scanning and causing a lot of traffic on the
network. IP Addresses are:
130.129.139.106
130.129.139.203
Please check your machines for these addresses. If they are yours,
I also have seen ietf58 as an ad-hoc network (or Computer to Computer
Network as Apple calls it) in several locations today, including here
in Salon C.
I have to wonder if this is just cluelessness or malicious behaviour,
someone trying to steal packets.
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and
Roland -
I'll just note that when I ran the AODV code earlier today,
I had to hand reset noth my mode my essid (redhat linux/
wiconfig) after stopping the test code - this may not be
totally transparent to folks and they may reset the ssid
but miss the mode setting...
Lucy E. Lynch
]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: IETF58 - Network Status - 12:05PM Local Time
Hi,
We have been getting some reports of rooted machines (IETF Attendee machines,
not IETF NOC Machines) that are scanning and causing a lot of traffic on the
network. IP Addresses
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brett Thorson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: IETF58 - Network Status - 12:05PM Local Time
Hi,
We have been getting some reports of rooted machines (IETF Attendee machines,
not IETF
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:06:28 -0800 (PST)
Lucy E. Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll just note that when I ran the AODV code earlier today,
I had to hand reset noth my mode my essid (redhat linux/
wiconfig) after stopping the test code - this may not be
totally transparent to folks and they
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Is a very bad behavior from some people that it seems don't know how to
use their own computer.
I will say that this people should pay 5 times the normal fee in the
next IETF meeting, because the big number of troubles that they create
to the
]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: IETF58 - Network Status - 12:05PM Local Time
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Is a very bad behavior from some people that it seems don't know how to
use their own computer.
I will say that this people should pay 5
16 matches
Mail list logo
