On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:41 PM, Michel Py wrote:
IMHO, the only valid stats we can gather are either from a large content
provider (which is why Lorenzo's numbers are so interesting) or from a
large eyeball ISP. Cisco, Juniper, Apple, the academia, the IETF, etc
are NOT valid places to collect
On Jul 29, 2011, at 1:14 AM, Michel Py wrote:
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
6rd is global unicast... there's nothing to discriminate
it from any other native range.
No. there is nothing in the current classification algorithm to
discriminate from any other native range. But it's not native, as it
Michel,
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
6rd is global unicast... there's nothing to discriminate
it from any other native range.
No. there is nothing in the current classification algorithm to
discriminate from any other native range. But it's not native, as it
has, among other things, the same
agree but if you're trying to discriminate it by:
This graph shows the daily unique queried reverse addresses by type.
you can't.
On Jul 29, 2011, at 1:14 AM, Michel Py wrote:
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
6rd is global unicast... there's nothing to discriminate
it from any other native range.
No.
On 29/07/2011, at 8:03 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
agree but if you're trying to discriminate it by:
This graph shows the daily unique queried reverse addresses by type.
you can't.
Very true Joel. I did, for a while, pattern match the 6rd prefix from Free.FR's
declared ranges in RIPE
Le 28 juil. 2011 à 08:07, Michel Py a écrit :
James,
If I remember correctly, you mentioned a bit ago that your job required
you had native IPv6 at home.
Question: Does an ISP providing you IPv6 out of the CPE box (meaning,
without any software other than dual-stack on the hosts)
On Jul 29, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Rémi Després wrote:
Le 28 juil. 2011 à 08:07, Michel Py a écrit :
James,
If I remember correctly, you mentioned a bit ago that your job required
you had native IPv6 at home.
Question: Does an ISP providing you IPv6 out of the CPE box (meaning,
without
Le 29 juil. 2011 à 15:51, Joel Jaeggli a écrit :
On Jul 29, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Rémi Després wrote:
Le 28 juil. 2011 à 08:07, Michel Py a écrit :
James,
If I remember correctly, you mentioned a bit ago that your job required
you had native IPv6 at home.
Question: Does an ISP
Le 29 juil. 2011 à 14:16, George Michaelson a écrit :
On 29/07/2011, at 8:03 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
agree but if you're trying to discriminate it by:
This graph shows the daily unique queried reverse addresses by type.
you can't.
Very true Joel. I did, for a while, pattern
I have updated the graph to include 6rd, based on my understanding that the
prefixes of the form 2a01:e3xx: are your 6rd space.
There is *other* FreeNet space, which appears to do things, but I sense its not
part of the 6rd deployment since the numberforms in the lower /64 appear to be
The Comcast 6rd trial will conclude very soon, so I do not recommend doing
anything specific for Comcast 6rd.
John
=
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
e) mailto:john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com
o) 609-377-6594
m) 484-962-0060
w) http://www.comcast6.net
a tunnel broker, or 6rd?
james woodyatt wrote:
p1. Those numbers are badly outdated.
What is your reading on 6rd numbers? And if these numbers are badly
outdated, where do you place the MacOS IPv6 traffic distribution today?
p3. Recent measurements of hits originating from Mac OS X
hosts
On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:30 AM, james woodyatt wrote:
I think the measurements we've all seen at the technical plenary show that
6to4 is a small percentage of the total world IPv6 traffic now, which again
is an embarrassingly small fraction of global Internet traffic.
What I saw from
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 01:30, james woodyatt j...@apple.com wrote:
http://www.pam2010.ethz.ch/papers/full-length/15.pdf
Slightly less than 50% of IPv6 traffic comes from a MacOS client (fig
3); about 90% MacOS hits is 6to4, which possibly means (to me) that this
piece of 6to4 MacOS
Lorenzo,
Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics/
Thanks for the update.
Clarification: in your stats, is AS12322's traffic classified as native
or as 6to4/teredo?
Michel.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 16:51, Michel Py mic...@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
wrote:
Clarification: in your stats, is AS12322's traffic classified as native
or as 6to4/teredo?
As the webpage says: The Total IPv6 graph shows IPv6 users with any type of
connectivity, while the Native IPv6 graph
On 28 Jul 2011, at 21:51, Michel Py wrote:
Lorenzo,
Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics/
Thanks for the update.
Clarification: in your stats, is AS12322's traffic classified as native
or as 6to4/teredo?
Hi,
I just ran a search through our Netflow
Bad question, I apologize for the imprecision. Please allow me to
rephrase.
Michel Py wrote:
Clarification: in your stats, is AS12322's traffic
classified as native or as 6to4/teredo?
Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
As the webpage says: The Total IPv6 graph shows IPv6
users with any type of
Looking at a trace that I got from Geoff Huston a month or two ago,
there are 25486 IPv6 TCP sessions of which 10748 have a 6to4 source
address.
That's surprisingly high, showing that the answer depends greatly on
the point of observation, and explains why operators really need
to try to run a
you may like to look at
http://labs.apnic.net/dns-measurement/
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On Jul 28, 2011, at 7:41 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Looking at a trace that I got from Geoff Huston a month or two ago,
there are 25486 IPv6 TCP sessions of which 10748 have a 6to4 source
address.
That's surprisingly high, showing that the answer depends greatly on
the point of
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Looking at a trace that I got from Geoff Huston a month or
two ago, there are 25486 IPv6 TCP sessions of which 10748
have a 6to4 source address. That's surprisingly high,
Not to me.
showing that the answer depends greatly on the
point of observation
Indeed this is
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:41 PM, Michel Py wrote:
Same remarks as above, plus I don't see there anything that separates
6rd.
6rd is global unicast... there's nothing to discriminate it from any other
native range.
Michel.
___
Ietf mailing
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
6rd is global unicast... there's nothing to discriminate
it from any other native range.
No. there is nothing in the current classification algorithm to
discriminate from any other native range. But it's not native, as it
has, among other things, the same reliance on IPv4
On Jul 27, 2011, at 11:12 PM, Michel Py wrote:
According to this:
http://www.pam2010.ethz.ch/papers/full-length/15.pdf
Slightly less than 50% of IPv6 traffic comes from a MacOS client (fig
3); about 90% MacOS hits is 6to4, which possibly means (to me) that this
piece of 6to4 MacOS software
25 matches
Mail list logo
