-Original Message-
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 9:13 AM
To: Simon Josefsson
Cc: Sam Hartman; ietf@ietf.org; Steven M. Bellovin
Subject: Re: In support of symbolic references
Simon,
Maybe we can lobby for it to become
John C Klensin schrieb:
--On Thursday, 05 April, 2007 15:48 -0400 Sam Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I'm sitting here reviewing changes to a document to see
if I can last call it.
As part of a response to AD review comments, one of the
references were changed. This document uses
--On Saturday, April 07, 2007 5:52 PM +0200 Julian Reschke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Second, because of the desire to create a universal naming
scheme in the bibliographical libraries, xml2rfc ends up with
symbolic references that look like
[I-D.rfc-editor-rfc2223bis] (one of the less
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2007-04-06 08:12, Jari Arkko wrote:
Simon,
Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default.
+1
(I think it would be the right default, even if I agree with John
Klensin's concern.)
Putting symrefs into all the xml2rfc templates would not be a
bad idea.
The
Michael StJohns wrote:
Going back to the original problem, it might be more useful to use an xml
diff program than a text diff program since that's where the changes will
be made (and visible). The anchors and targets will stay stable.
Maybe we can have this added to the tool set?
+1
d/
Simon,
Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default.
+1
(I think it would be the right default, even if I agree with John
Klensin's concern.)
Jari
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On 2007-04-06 08:12, Jari Arkko wrote:
Simon,
Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default.
+1
(I think it would be the right default, even if I agree with John
Klensin's concern.)
Putting symrefs into all the xml2rfc templates would not be a
bad idea. If you want to suggest a change in
In his previous mail Jari wrote:
Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default.
+1
(I think it would be the right default, even if I agree with John
Klensin's concern.)
= +1 too
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Ietf mailing list
Hi. I'm sitting here reviewing changes to a document to see if I can
last call it.
As part of a response to AD review comments, one of the references
were changed. This document uses numeric references. Starting at
reference 16, everything was renumbered. That makes the diff a pain.
For
was renumbered. That makes the diff a pain.
For this and many other reasons, I strongly encourage people to avoid
numeric references in their documents.
That makes sense, but I believe the default for the xml2rfc tool is to
produce numeric references. Does xml2rfc support symbolic references
tool is to
produce numeric references. Does xml2rfc support symbolic references?
If the defaults in xml2rfc is changed to symbolic references, I think
we'd see that a lot of documents would adopt the new approach.
Use the line
?rfc symrefs=yes ?
to get symbolic references
sense, but I believe the default for the xml2rfc tool is to
produce numeric references. Does xml2rfc support symbolic references?
If the defaults in xml2rfc is changed to symbolic references, I think
we'd see that a lot of documents would adopt the new approach.
Use the line
?rfc
*
* That makes sense, but I believe the default for the xml2rfc tool is to
* produce numeric references. Does xml2rfc support symbolic references?
* If the defaults in xml2rfc is changed to symbolic references, I think
* we'd see that a lot of documents would adopt the new approach
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:00:24 +0200
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use the line
?rfc symrefs=yes ?
to get symbolic references.
Neat. Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default. Is there some
IDNit rule that suggest or imply that references should be numeric?
--On Thursday, 05 April, 2007 15:48 -0400 Sam Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I'm sitting here reviewing changes to a document to see
if I can last call it.
As part of a response to AD review comments, one of the
references were changed. This document uses numeric
references.
I just use nroff and have no trouble creating whatever succinct symbolic
references I want.
Donald
-Original Message-
From: John C Klensin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:26 PM
To: Sam Hartman; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: In support of symbolic references
On 4/5/07, John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... xml2rfc ends up with
symbolic references that look like
[I-D.rfc-editor-rfc2223bis] (one of the less unattractive ones)
or, potentially,
[I-D.draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434-bis]. Those
things cause formatting problems, violate
17 matches
Mail list logo
