At 15:35 06/12/2000 -0700, Vernon Schryver wrote:
The same thinking that says that MIME Version headers make sense in
general IETF list mail also says that localized alphabets and glyphs must
be used in absolutely all contexts, including those that everyone must
use and so would expect to be
From: Harald Alvestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The same thinking that says that MIME Version headers make sense in
general IETF list mail also says that localized alphabets and glyphs must
be used in absolutely all contexts, including those that everyone must
use and so would expect to be
Keith Moore wrote:
Furthermore, a
great many people use multiple languages (not necessarily including
English) is, so that a given person, host, or subnetwork will often
need to exist in multiple (potentially competing) locales at once.
Sometimes even in the same sentence. My mother grew
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 07:23:11 -0500
From: Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At least the recipient has the unintelligible data well isolated and
labeled. MIME did its job.
Indeed. If I get a mail message which is in HTML only, 99.97% of the
time it's SPAM-mail. And I've lost
From: Henk Langeveld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You know, it isn't that long ago that I realised that for many Americans,
"International" is synonymous with "Non-American".
That is as true as the observation that many who learn English as a
second language think that "international" is synonymous
If the world had asked you or me to design an international
language, I think either of us would have done better.
Don't be too sure. Even today, there are no more speakers of
Esperanto than of Mayan.
