From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why not to follow under IAB guidance (or to review) the charter I
proposed
yesterday, in an IETF way everyone could participate, and to have all
these
applications supported one shot in working on a linguistic ontology
where
each language instance
At 16:29 05/01/2005, Peter Constable wrote:
From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why not to follow under IAB guidance (or to review) the charter I
proposed
yesterday, in an IETF way everyone could participate, and to have all
these
applications supported one shot in working on a
At 03:11 04/01/2005, Addison Phillips [wM] wrote:
I'm not going to respond to most of Jefsey's comments. However, wearing my
W3C hat for a moment*
Thank you for that.
To the extent that W3C specifications are important consumers of language
tags, there is interest at W3C and I'm sure the
I'm not going to respond to most of Jefsey's comments. However, wearing my W3C
hat for a moment
Jefsey wrote:
- RFC 3066bis wants to fix some of the W3C needs, in a way which would
make these patches Internet standards. This is not the appropriate way.
(There is a W3C document on its way,
