RE: Last 7 days on the IETF list

2003-06-05 Thread Avi Lior
please do your job and moderate!!! > -Original Message- > From: Marc Schneiders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 9:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Rob Austein; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Last 7 days on the IETF list > > > I am sur

Re: Last 7 days on the IETF list

2003-06-05 Thread Marc Schneiders
I am sure you are right, but in the list below the bytes and number-of-messages rankings are more or less identical. Since this is in the context of overload of the list by a limited number of people, the number of bytes real contribution is not relevant. People don't read it anymore. All what coun

Re: Last 7 days on the IETF list

2003-06-02 Thread Kurt Erik Lindqvist
On lördag, maj 31, 2003, at 06:12 Europe/Stockholm, Michel Py wrote: Rob Austein wrote Traffic statistics (as seen from my cave, your mileage may vary) for the last seven days on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Thanks for posting this. I was about to join another poster in saying that you shou

Re: Last 7 days on the IETF list

2003-06-01 Thread Dave Aronson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't think posting message size is quite appropriate as part of > your statistics and even more particularly as a criteria to order the > list. Unless I'm mistaken you're calculating bytes for entire message > but often > 75% comes from another message being repli

RE: Last 7 days on the IETF list

2003-05-31 Thread Michel Py
Rob, > Rob Austein wrote > Traffic statistics (as seen from my cave, your mileage > may vary) for the last seven days on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] > mailing list. Thanks for posting this. I was about to join another poster in saying that you should not have posted the bytes; however, on second though

Re: Last 7 days on the IETF list

2003-05-31 Thread shogunx
well, i guess i got shorted on my .02 (insert currency here) then. where can i collect my other .001 of messages posted, and my .002 of data transfer? scott > > Messages | Bytes | Who > > ---+-+---+-+ > > 11.4% | 53 | 13.9% | 233614 | [E

Re: Last 7 days on the IETF list

2003-05-31 Thread william
I don't think posting message size is quite appropriate as part of your statistics and even more particularly as a criteria to order the list. Unless I'm mistaken you're calculating bytes for entire message but often > 75% comes from another message being replied to and so you can't really judge

Re: Last 7 days on the IETF list

2003-05-31 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Now post the same numbers for the past year, and perhaps some even more interesting conclusions can be drawn. - Original Message - From: "Rob Austein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 20:47 Subject: Last 7 days on the IETF list

Last 7 days on the IETF list

2003-05-31 Thread Rob Austein
Traffic statistics (as seen from my cave, your milage may vary) for the last seven days on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Conclusions, if any, are left as an exercise for the reader. Messages | Bytes | Who ---+-+---+-+ 11.4% | 53 |