Hi Jari,
-Original Message-
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 2:24 AM
To: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
Cc: Pasi Eronen; ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf
(ImprovedExtensible
Joe,
First, after some discussion with some of the users of this spec from
3GPP, we have decided that AT_KDF=1 or the AKA fallback mode should be
removed.
AT_KDF_INPUT field values would indeed be dependent on which KDF is
used. I will make the second change you suggested to fix this.
On
Hi Jari,
This discussion has prompted me to look at the spec again. Is there a
need to fall back to the AKA derivation? It seems that the AAA
providing AKA or AKA' support would know what is supported by the
infrastructure. Having the fallback to AKA is confusing. If you chose
the alternate
