This is an interesting proposal, however I would suggest that
the grammatical mistakes relative to the french language
and the cultural references be fixed.
Suggestions:
s/The Ambassadeur-General du France/L'Ambassadeur de France/
s/Le Academie Francais/L'Académie Française/
s/Pate-du-Cochon-Degou
Merci bien pour votre suggestions ... JSPF (Je suis pas francais). :))
Regards,
Carl
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> This is an interesting proposal, however I would suggest that
> the grammatical mistakes relative to the french language
> and the cultural references be fixe
On 24 Feb 2005, at 10:00, Carl Malamud wrote:
Merci bien pour votre suggestions ... JSPF (Je suis pas francais). :))
Tiny grammatical nits in the last paragraph of section 5:
- In summary, for senders and receivers of email, use of the
- "No-Solicit:" mechanism would be simply to understand and u
ideration of the IETF on what to do with the draft.
Brian
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ietf-announce-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The IESG
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:35 AM
> To: IETF-Announce
> Subject: Last Call: 'Labe
Hi Brian -
> I read the first draft of this document, and wondered:
> Does this propose to change IETF behavior on list management, so that the
> name of the list (usually same as working group) is not put in the Subject:
> using the feature of mailman that does this?
>
That isn't the specific p
om: "Carl Malamud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Alain Durand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ;
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 7:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At
> Best' to Informational RF
> Hi -
>
> http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt says:
>
> "Internet-Drafts must be in ASCII. No 8bit chars are currently allowed.
> If you need to include codepoints, a suggestion might be to use the
> unicode convention: U+, where X is a hexadecimal digit."
>
> So, for the quotes, if
The document does not discuss the type of mailing list subject labels
that you're referring to.
I'm arguing that a better title of the document would be
Legislated Labels in Email Subject Headers Considered
Ineffective At Best
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carl Malamud wro
At 00:15 25/02/2005, Carl Malamud wrote:
http://trusted.resource.org/no-solicit/ has the xml source and the
html rendition. In the xml, I use the proper utf-8, which shows up
in full glory in the html. For the ascii version, I concur with
Randy's opinion that it makes the most sense to sacrifice
Carl Malamud wrote:
> my repeated apologies to any citizens of Freedonia as well
Maybe you could mention that RfC 3834 with its "[Auto]" label
is and was no problem, and it doesn't need any "solicitation
classes" to work. But don't mention "Re:" unless you REally
plan to REvive some endless thre
> A very simple solution would be to write the documents in French :-)
>
That would be illegal. ;)
Carl
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
*>
*> > A very simple solution would be to write the documents in French :-)
*> >
*>
*> That would be illegal. ;)
*>
*> Carl
*>
Ah, but here is the clever bit. We don't CALL it French, we call
it Freedom Language.
Bob Braden
___
At 11:30 25/02/2005, Carl Malamud wrote:
> A very simple solution would be to write the documents in French :-)
That would be illegal. ;)
This was a joke, but you make it an issue: illegal for who?
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.o
13 matches
Mail list logo
