s George
>
>
>> -----Original Message----- From: ietf-announce-boun...@ietf.org
>> [mailto:ietf-announce- boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG
>> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 5:34 PM To: IETF-Announce Subject:
>> Last Call: (Experiences
>> from an IPv6-O
> But at the end of the day, I think running code, real world situation,
> and useful information for the reader trump such concerns.
the truth shall make you free
randy
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
If the information presented in the document is "historic" the minute its
posted (because its a snapshot), why not post the doc as "historic"?
Stephan
On 12.16.2011 07:00 , "Jari Arkko" wrote:
>Wes: I understand your concern, and it certainly has given us pause when
>speaking about these results
Wes: I understand your concern, and it certainly has given us pause when
speaking about these results in different forums.
But at the end of the day, I think running code, real world situation, and
useful information for the reader trump such concerns. I think we should be
open about the issue
unce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-
> boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 5:34 PM
> To: IETF-Announce
> Subject: Last Call:
> (Experiences from an IPv6-Only Network) to Informational RFC
>
>
> The IESG has received a request f
I support publishing this document. It is covers an important topic that is
useful to the community.
Bob
On Dec 10, 2011, at 12:33 AM, The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'Experiences from an IPv6-Only Netw
