On 6/11/12 3:42 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-06-11 22:31, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> ...
>> RFC 2818 is extremely minimal in its description of the 'https' URI
>> scheme. At least draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging is a bit more complete.
>> However, the IANA Considerations of the latter docum
On 2012-06-11 22:31, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
...
RFC 2818 is extremely minimal in its description of the 'https' URI
scheme. At least draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging is a bit more complete.
However, the IANA Considerations of the latter document need to be
modified so that they instruct the IANA
On 6/10/12 11:39 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Adding to what SM already wrote (and yes, I've reread the whole
> document):
>
> On 1 Jun 2012, at 21:23, SM wrote:
>
>> At 09:42 01-06-2012, IESG Secretary wrote:
>>> The IESG has received a request from the TLS Working Group to
>>> reclassify RFC 2
Adding to what SM already wrote (and yes, I've reread the whole document):
On 1 Jun 2012, at 21:23, SM wrote:
> At 09:42 01-06-2012, IESG Secretary wrote:
>> The IESG has received a request from the TLS Working Group to reclassify RFC
>> 2818 (HTTP Over TLS) to Proposed Standard.
>>
>> The IES
At 09:42 01-06-2012, IESG Secretary wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the TLS Working Group to
reclassify RFC 2818 (HTTP Over TLS) to Proposed Standard.
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive
comme
